This is still an issue, reported again by a user.
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 04 Mar 2007 14:38:31 +0100, a écrit :
> The following issue is still not resolved, resulting to X session not
> properly killing the X server at its end of its life.
>
> Samuel Thibault, le Tue 29 Aug 2006 21:10:14 +0200, a
retitle 413326 user-launched xinit can't kill X server at end of session
thanks
Hi,
The following issue is still not resolved, resulting to X session not
properly killing the X server at its end of its life.
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 29 Aug 2006 21:10:14 +0200, a écrit :
> Thomas Bushnell BSG, le
Thomas Bushnell BSG, le Tue 29 Aug 2006 11:58:43 -0700, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Roland McGrath, le Mon 28 Aug 2006 17:34:24 -0700, a écrit :
> >> It sounds like you are describing the intended behavior.
> >> You can't send a signal to a setuid program with kil
Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roland McGrath, le Mon 28 Aug 2006 17:34:24 -0700, a écrit :
>> It sounds like you are describing the intended behavior.
>> You can't send a signal to a setuid program with kill.
>
> For a process to have permission to send a signal to a process desi
Roland McGrath, le Mon 28 Aug 2006 17:34:24 -0700, a écrit :
> It sounds like you are describing the intended behavior.
> You can't send a signal to a setuid program with kill.
For a process to have permission to send a signal to a process designated
by pid, unless the sending process has appr
It sounds like you are describing the intended behavior.
You can't send a signal to a setuid program with kill.
Terminal signals work.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Hi,
There's an issue with Joe user being able to kill setuid programs that
he launches: on the sending side, glibc does:
err = HURD_MSGPORT_RPC (__proc_getmsgport (proc, pid, &msgport),
(taskerr = __proc_pid2task (proc, pid,