[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I'm also interessed in assigning my copyright to the FSF, for both
> gnumach an
On Fri, 2022-08-05 at 23:40 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider
> ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,
> ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example.
> ]]]
>
> > > Seco
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > Secondly, it might conflict with NDAs in my work.
Can you state concretely the
Hello,
Opening this file again:
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, le jeu. 27 oct. 2016 23:04:26 +0300, a ecrit:
> Olaf Buddenhagen writes:
>
> > BTW, this is slightly off-topic: but AIUI, your main objection to
> > signing a copyright assignment is the requirement to provide updates on
> > your employer?
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:04:26PM +0300, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
> | 2. Developer will report occasionally, on its initiative and whenever
> | requested by FSF, the changes and/or enhancements which are covered by
> | this contract, and (to the extent known to Developer) any outstanding
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo writes:
> I sent email to ass...@gnu.org today, asking whether they still
> use this clause
They replied that they still use the clause.
I don't think I'll agree to the contract, then.
Olaf Buddenhagen writes:
> BTW, this is slightly off-topic: but AIUI, your main objection to
> signing a copyright assignment is the requirement to provide updates on
> your employer?
This was the onerous clause in 2000:
| 2. Developer will report occasionally, on its initiative and whenever
|
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:34:00PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Oddly enough, in the fencepost copyright file, I see assignments for
> GNUMACH, but not for MIG.
Yes, AIUI a gnumach assignment is supposed to cover MiG contributions as
well...
-antrik-
Olaf Buddenhagen, on Mon 26 Sep 2016 19:08:15 +0200, wrote:
> > Does the same policy apply to MIG as well?
>
> Since it's formally part of gnumach, I *assume* the same policy
> applies...
Oddly enough, in the fencepost copyright file, I see assignments for
GNUMACH, but not for MIG.
Samuel
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:45:58PM +0300, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
> Olaf Buddenhagen writes:
> > The FSF doesn't actually require assignments for gnumach -- almost all
> > of gnumach is foreign code without FSF copyright anyway...
>
> Thank you. I had assumed that the old Mach code wa
Olaf Buddenhagen writes:
> The FSF doesn't actually require assignments for gnumach -- almost all
> of gnumach is foreign code without FSF copyright anyway...
Thank you. I had assumed that the old Mach code was
grandfathered in, and that the FSF would require copyright
assignments for any new a
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 03:27:05PM +, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
> If I understand
> https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html#Legally-Significant correctly,
> the FSF does not want more than around 15 lines of code without a copyright
> assignment.
The FSF doesn't actually requi
12 matches
Mail list logo
