Re: SOCK_CLOEXEC glibc patches (was: dbus startup problem when built with eglibc-2.17)

2013-09-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Sat 21 Sep 2013 17:02:28 +0200, a écrit : > Strange, Pino just said on IRC that the patches were not accepted in > upstream libc, and the t/verify (whatever that is) might not even be > acceptable eglibc? t/verify is already as a patch debian's eglibc Samuel

Re: SOCK_CLOEXEC glibc patches (was: dbus startup problem when built with eglibc-2.17)

2013-09-21 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 15:57 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Thomas Schwinge, le Mon 02 Sep 2013 23:56:08 +0200, a écrit : > > I have implemented SOCK_CLOEXEC for socket in TopGit branch > > t/socket_flags and for socketpair in t/socketpair_flags > > I have just added them to the debian

Re: SOCK_CLOEXEC glibc patches (was: dbus startup problem when built with eglibc-2.17)

2013-09-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Thomas Schwinge, le Mon 02 Sep 2013 23:56:08 +0200, a écrit : > I have implemented SOCK_CLOEXEC for socket in TopGit branch > t/socket_flags and for socketpair in t/socketpair_flags I have just added them to the debian glibc package. Samuel

Re: SOCK_CLOEXEC glibc patches (was: dbus startup problem when built with eglibc-2.17)

2013-09-03 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 23:56 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > This is strange -- nearly five years ago, I have implemented SOCK_CLOEXEC > for socket in TopGit branch t/socket_flags and for socketpair in > t/socketpair_flags (plus depending branches t/fcntl-internal.h and > t/verify.h). Cou

SOCK_CLOEXEC glibc patches (was: dbus startup problem when built with eglibc-2.17)

2013-09-02 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Mon, 02 Sep 2013 22:35:51 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > After building dbus-1.6.12-1 with eglibc-2.17-92 starting dbus-daemon > fails (it was built 80 days ago with eglibc-2.13). The problem is due to > the two statements in dbus/dbus-sysdeps-unix.c: > *fd_p = socket (domain, type | SO

Re: glibc patches

2009-03-02 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thomas Schwinge, le Sun 01 Mar 2009 11:01:11 +0100, a écrit : > > Nevertheless, for now, as I can't commit to the Debian glibc SVN repo, I > > send this to you, Samuel. Here are comments on some of the patches from > > [glibc]/trunk/debian/patches/hurd-i386/: > > Another one: as per a recent glib

Re: glibc patches

2009-03-02 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Thomas Schwinge, le Sat 28 Feb 2009 17:41:56 +0100, a écrit : > I think I would base this on the official glibc git mirror and publish > it again from the Hurd Savannah git repository Mmm, shouldn't we rather maintain a patch queue? That would make (re-)submission/review easier. > cvs-EC

Re: glibc patches

2009-03-01 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 05:41:56PM +0100, I wrote: > what about going a different route and really go ahead and > publish a glibc fork for Hurd use? I think I would base this on the > official glibc git mirror and publish it again from the Hurd Savannah git > repository -- a waste of disk

glibc patches

2009-02-28 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! Yesterday night I spent another hour with synchronizing patches between the Debian glibc repo, my own collection, and what is in upstream by now. (The latter part being the easiest to handle...) As Roland is obviously not interested in committing my dup3 et al. changes (doesn't even reply

glibc patches for GNU/Hurd (was: ``struct stat'' issue)

2007-11-16 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 07:43:13PM +0100, I wrote: > Also, I'll make up a repository with all glibc patches I'm using for > GNU/Hurd. <http://www.schwinge.homeip.net/~thomas/tmp/glibc-patches/> This is a mixture of stuff of mine and stuff of Debian people. I did