Roland McGrath, le Thu 02 Apr 2009 16:22:24 -0700, a écrit :
> > I am just wondering: why are faults a problem? The bug I'm seeing seems
> > to happen when there is memory pressure and I guess gnumach trying to
> > drop pages. But since exec doesn't seem to use its own pager, shouldn't
> > the us
> Ok, so I was right in thinking that maybe I could just disable them.
Yes, if people are not using individually compressed binaries for booting
these days.
> I am just wondering: why are faults a problem? The bug I'm seeing seems
> to happen when there is memory pressure and I guess gnumach try
Roland McGrath, le Wed 01 Apr 2009 16:49:03 -0700, a écrit :
> A few notes.
Thanks!
> The gzip/bzip2 hack in exec was really never intended for general use.
> It's only there for bootstrap exec to be able to use it.
Ok, so I was right in thinking that maybe I could just disable them.
> The XXX/
A few notes. I'll leave it to you how to put them all together.
The gzip/bzip2 hack in exec was really never intended for general use.
It's only there for bootstrap exec to be able to use it. For normal use,
you really want a proper decompression translator that is smarter about
memory use and d
Hello Roland,
You knew we'd be bitten by the bug someday, and that's today. From
exec/exec.c:
/* XXX all accesses of the mapped data need to use fault handling
to abort the RPC when mapped file data generates bad page faults.
I've marked some accesses with XXX/fault comments.
--roland