On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 01:17:18AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 09:12:32AM +0200, Niels M?ller wrote:
[...]
> > Hmm, now I realize that one assumption I've been making throughout
> > this discussion is that we're using fixed width fonts. If one wants to
> > get rid of t
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 01:17:18AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 09:12:32AM +0200, Niels M?ller wrote:
> > I imagine that the console server wants to handle
> > things like TABS and linewrapping, so that it needs to know the with
> > of the glyphs. Is that wrong?
>
> No
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 09:12:32AM +0200, Niels Möller wrote:
> I imagine that the console server wants to handle
> things like TABS and linewrapping, so that it needs to know the with
> of the glyphs. Is that wrong?
No, it is correct. The console server definitely needs to know the width of
the
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 07:15:23AM +0200, Stephan Trebels wrote:
> Why you didn't create separate matrixes for attr, 1st char, second
> char, or for simplicity mandatory vs. optional matrixes.
Several reasons:
Because then if you change a character, you need to send two change
notifications if yo
