Riccardo Mottola, on lun. 02 oct. 2017 22:29:20 +0200, wrote:
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Riccardo Mottola, on mer. 20 sept. 2017 23:53:17 +0200, wrote:
> > > > xterm: Error 27, errno 1073741849: Inappropriate ioctl for device
> > > > Reason: spawn: ioctl() failed on TIOCLSET
> > > There are pro
Hi Samuel,
Samuel Thibault wrote:
Riccardo Mottola, on mer. 20 sept. 2017 23:53:17 +0200, wrote:
xterm: Error 27, errno 1073741849: Inappropriate ioctl for device
Reason: spawn: ioctl() failed on TIOCLSET
There are probably a lot more things like that which we shouldn't
expose.
(At least thos
Samuel Thibault, on jeu. 21 sept. 2017 00:24:28 +0200, wrote:
> Riccardo Mottola, on mer. 20 sept. 2017 23:53:17 +0200, wrote:
> > xterm: Error 27, errno 1073741849: Inappropriate ioctl for device
> > Reason: spawn: ioctl() failed on TIOCLSET
>
> There are probably a lot more things like that whic
Hello,
Riccardo Mottola, on mer. 20 sept. 2017 23:53:17 +0200, wrote:
> xterm: Error 27, errno 1073741849: Inappropriate ioctl for device
> Reason: spawn: ioctl() failed on TIOCLSET
Mmm, this is indeed not implemented.
We should probably not expose it in bits/ioctls.h.
There are probably a lot
Hi HURDers,
Both if I start xterm as uxterm, I get these errors:
$ uxterm
xterm: Error 27, errno 1073741849: Inappropriate ioctl for device
Reason: spawn: ioctl() failed on TIOCLSET
$ xterm
xterm: Error 27, errno 1073741849: Inappropriate ioctl for device
Reason: spawn: ioctl() failed on TIOCLS