Hi,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 09:16:04AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 22. September 2009 00:44:55 schrieb
> olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> > The only major advantage of Mercurial over Git seems to be that it's
> > easier to grasp initially (at least for people coming from CVS/SVN)
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 05:26:54PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 16:54:54 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
>
> > I have a course of German at the University now, so I'll soon become a
> > true Hurd man :-) (since, apparently, a lot of Hurd people speak
> > Germ
Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 16:54:54 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > It sort of automatically creates shorter aliases for you - saves
> > keystrokes.
>
> Aha, so it does so automatically. I somehow thought you have to
> define aliases by yourself.
You can, but you don't have to.
> > And when y
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 04:01:36PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 14:45:41 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > Well, yes, but wasn't CVS, for instance, created for distributed code
> > collaboration, too? Or do I understand the word ``distributed''
> > wrong?
Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 14:45:41 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> Well, yes, but wasn't CVS, for instance, created for distributed code
> collaboration, too? Or do I understand the word ``distributed''
> wrong?
The difference is that in CVS you have a reference server, so it's normally
called "c
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 02:09:32PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 13:23:43 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > Hm, I thought there would be more differences than that. Although
> > from your discussion with Arne last summer I could only suppose that
> > git an
Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 13:33:08 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > Also you can very easily customize it with extensions... damn, we had
> > that discussion already. It took several weeks of pages-long E-Mails :-)
>
> Oh, I really didn't mean to make both you and antrik repeat what you
> have onc
Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 13:23:43 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> Hm, I thought there would be more differences than that. Although
> from your discussion with Arne last summer I could only suppose that
> git and Mercurial are very similar in many approaches.
They were written for the same usecas
me, but having fun
learning new stuff :-)
> Or you want to be fluid enough to be able to get working instantly,
> if you should happen to get accross a project which uses the other
> VCS (that's the reason why I learned basic Bazaar usage - and it
> paid off in the end, because I c
:-) It should be worth
> > the time ;-)
>
> Only if you actually get involved in a project using it.
>
> Learning another VCS just for the sake of it is surely not worth the
> time. The only major advantage of Mercurial over Git seems to be that
> it's easier to gras
e worth
> > the time ;-)
>
> Only if you actually get involved in a project using it.
Or you like to check different systems, because it's interesting to see their
differences :)
Or you want to be fluid enough to be able to get working instantly, if you
should happen to get accro
arning another VCS just for the sake of it is surely not worth the
time. The only major advantage of Mercurial over Git seems to be that
it's easier to grasp initially (at least for people coming from CVS/SVN)
-- and as you already know Git fairly well, there is nothing to win
there for you...
-antrik-
12 matches
Mail list logo
