On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 07:38:54AM +0200, Marin Ramesa wrote:
> This is more a question than a patch.
>
> Why don't the device pager hash functions use the device server routines to
> track
> the device associated ports?
>
> If the the devices and associated ports are not in one-to-one correspo
This is more a question than a patch.
Why don't the device pager hash functions use the device server routines to
track
the device associated ports?
If the the devices and associated ports are not in one-to-one correspodence,
why do
hash functions take ports as arguments, why not simply device
