Hi,
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 02:01:12AM +0100, Flávio Cruz wrote:
> You are right, it may create redundancy but, wouldn't it be nice to
> define new interfaces without leaving lisp and then using them to
> create new servers only with lisp code? I'm not even talking about
> re-defining the already
> A little side node: You are regularily using "pretend" in a manner that
> doesn't quite fit the context in English, and in fact is quite amusing
> :-)
Ahah, checked that up on a dictionary, indeed, it's quite amusing ;-)
> I don't think it's a good idea to define the interfaces in a completely
Hi,
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 09:04:49PM +0100, Flávio Cruz wrote:
> Here's what I pretend to do during the summer session for GSOC:
A little side node: You are regularily using "pretend" in a manner that
doesn't quite fit the context in English, and in fact is quite amusing
:-)
> Will involve th
Here's what I pretend to do during the summer session for GSOC:
1. API to create RPC calls on the fly (something like defrpc)
Will involve the creation of an API that can generate new RPC calls as
MIG does but using Lisp macros. This interface should be micro-kernel
agnostic. Of course the inner
