On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:01:03PM -0700, Thomas DiModica wrote:
> Richard, if you wish to remove this optimization for the sake of clarity, be
> my guest. I was just trying to be faithful to the working of the original
> code.
I won't remove it for two reasons: first, it looks indeed faithful to
I'm CCing this to bug-hurd.
So, this is the long version of what my pthreads patch to ufs does.
If anyone finds my beliefs to be in error, please speak up.
I will begin by describing how a cthread rwlock worked, in brief. Inside the
cthread rwlock, there is a condition that all waiters sleep on.
