Hi,
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 08:12:38PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 08:19:01PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:58:07PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > > Having a ``proxy'' do an io_restrict_auth before passing on a port
>
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 08:19:01PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:58:07PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:55:38PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> > wrote:
>
> > > It is actually a problem that this policy is not followed wh
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:58:07PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:55:38PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > It is actually a problem that this policy is not followed whenever
> > an intermediate translator hands out a "real" port to another
> > transl
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:55:38PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:15:59PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
>
> > If run by any other user then it can only recreate the intersection of
> > credentials between unionfs and the client. This isn't ideal, but i
