On 21/05/17 13:45, Justus Winter wrote:
Samuel Thibault writes:
Though there was some work, a reimplementation if memory serves, of the
netmsg servers. The archive should have some infos on that.
Yes, by Brent who was the instigator of the original thread that I was
belatedly commenting t
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Justus Winter, on dim. 21 mai 2017 15:39:07 +0200, wrote:
>> Samuel Thibault writes:
>>
>> > Mark Morgan Lloyd, on sam. 20 mai 2017 12:18:01 +, wrote:
>> >> Finally, what is the Hurd portability situation? Way back I worked on a
>> >> microkernel in '386 protected
Justus Winter, on dim. 21 mai 2017 15:39:07 +0200, wrote:
> Samuel Thibault writes:
>
> > Mark Morgan Lloyd, on sam. 20 mai 2017 12:18:01 +, wrote:
> >> Finally, what is the Hurd portability situation? Way back I worked on a
> >> microkernel in '386 protected mode that used segmentation heavi
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Mark Morgan Lloyd, on sam. 20 mai 2017 12:18:01 +, wrote:
>> Finally, what is the Hurd portability situation? Way back I worked on a
>> microkernel in '386 protected mode that used segmentation heavily, am I
>> correct in assuming that that sort of thing is completel
Mark Morgan Lloyd, on sam. 20 mai 2017 12:18:01 +, wrote:
> Finally, what is the Hurd portability situation? Way back I worked on a
> microkernel in '386 protected mode that used segmentation heavily, am I
> correct in assuming that that sort of thing is completely deprecated in the
> interest
Please excuse my raising my head above the parapet, most of the time I'm
a lurker but I prefer the idea of a robustly-partitioned system and I
think the industry-wide events of the last week or so reinforce that.
>> [Brent said] The payoff is a supercomputer operating system that
>> presents an
