Karim Allah Ahmed, le Fri 16 Apr 2010 09:57:24 +0200, a écrit :
> On 4/15/10, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> - assert(init_alloc_aligned(round_page(len), &addr));
> >> + assert(init_alloc_aligned(kernel_cmdline_len, &addr));
> >
> > This is not the same: init_alloc_aligned used to r
On 4/15/10, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> -assert(init_alloc_aligned(round_page(len), &addr));
>> +assert(init_alloc_aligned(kernel_cmdline_len, &addr));
>
> This is not the same: init_alloc_aligned used to required size aligned
> on the page size.
>
i don't understand this one
Hello,
Karim Allah Ahmed, le Wed 14 Apr 2010 13:11:05 +0200, a écrit :
> The current "init_alloc_aligned" function will skip regions of memory
> during an allocation if they aren't of "size" bytes of contigous
> physical memory , and will never reclaim them later. ( it can't do
> that with a simpl
The current "init_alloc_aligned" function will skip regions of memory
during an allocation if they aren't of "size" bytes of contigous
physical memory , and will never reclaim them later. ( it can't do
that with a simple "available_next" )
In addition to the fact that it is unable to reserve any l
