Off Topic: Re: xz

2010-01-11 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2010 18:54:33 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net: > Just drop lzma-utils -- xz is the successor of lzma, and xz-utils > provide the lzma tools for compatibility. I had to fix the packages which still depended on lzma instad of xz :( Or at least that was the case a few weeks ag

Re: xz

2010-01-10 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, > xz-utils have been giving me trouble when upgrading for months now - > in Gentoo they clash with lzma-utils :( Just drop lzma-utils -- xz is the successor of lzma, and xz-utils provide the lzma tools for compatibility. -antrik-

Re: xz (was: Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer)

2010-01-08 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Donnerstag, 31. Dezember 2009 03:46:31 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net: > My remark probably was actually a bit premature: I fear xz-utils are not > yet easily available in stable distributions; so people might have > trouble reading .xz file if you send them out... xz-utils have been giving