Zhaoming Luo, le lun. 17 févr. 2025 12:21:53 +0800, a ecrit:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 10:30:17AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Zhaoming Luo, le dim. 16 févr. 2025 15:59:41 +0800, a ecrit:
> > > In the test[0] of vim. I think the issue is that the sleep time is not
> > > long en
On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 10:30:17AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Zhaoming Luo, le dim. 16 févr. 2025 15:59:41 +0800, a ecrit:
> > In the test[0] of vim. I think the issue is that the sleep time is not
> > long enough. Sleep for 200ms is possible to pass the test, though the
> > possib
Hello,
Zhaoming Luo, le dim. 16 févr. 2025 15:59:41 +0800, a ecrit:
> In the test[0] of vim. I think the issue is that the sleep time is not
> long enough. Sleep for 200ms is possible to pass the test, though the
> possibility is not that high. I think sleep for 2 seconds might be a
> good option.