>> 1. Has anybody thought about partial delegation of networking? Does
>>that make sense at all?
>
> I have some vague ideas. I think it does make sense, but making it
> work seems hard. But if someone prods me, then I can describe my
> vague ideas.
Prod, prod.
>> 3. Is there a reasonable
On 22-Nov-2001 Niels Möller wrote:
> philippe brochard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> but I think it's a good thing if we can run it with an unprivileged user.
>
> I'm not sure if there's any sensible way to delegate control over just
> some parts of the networking (e.g different network inte
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels Möller) writes:
> 1. Has anybody thought about partial delegation of networking? Does
>that make sense at all?
I have some vague ideas. I think it does make sense, but making it
work seems hard. But if someone prods me, then I can describe my
vague ideas.
> 3. Is
philippe brochard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> but I think it's a good thing if we can run it with an unprivileged user.
I'm not sure if there's any sensible way to delegate control over just
some parts of the networking (e.g different network interfaces), but
until someone comes up with a good
