Sergey Bugaev, le sam. 08 mai 2021 14:51:22 +0300, a ecrit:
> if we failed to set the translator (either
> because of this issue, or for any other reason), let's shut the
> translator back down instead of leaving it in limbo.
We'd rather do that indeed, thanks!
Samuel
Sergey Bugaev, le sam. 08 mai 2021 14:51:22 +0300, a ecrit:
> P.S. There must be something wrong with your mailserver. I only
> received a bunch of replies form you just a few minutes ago, and
> seemingly so did the archive [0], but your citation indicates that you
> have sent the reply promptly af
On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 2:39 PM Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I pushed the revert, thanks!
Thank you!
I'm attaching another patch that tries to make settrans handle this
case a tiny bit better: if we failed to set the translator (either
because of this issue, or for any other reason), let's shut the
t
Hello,
Sergey Bugaev, le ven. 07 mai 2021 15:41:17 +0300, a ecrit:
> I don't think I understand the reasoning behind [1]. Perhaps I'm
> missing something?
I don't see either why not deallocating it. Event if it's a dead name,
we want to deallocate it, so as to free the port name.
Samuel
Samuel Thibault, le ven. 07 mai 2021 15:29:49 +0200, a ecrit:
> Sergey Bugaev, le ven. 07 mai 2021 15:41:17 +0300, a ecrit:
> > I don't think I understand the reasoning behind [1]. Perhaps I'm
> > missing something?
>
> I don't see either why not deallocating it. Event if it's a dead name,
> we wa
> On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 06:58:59PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I suspect that presently if you use this (assuming settrans works right),
> > that the filesystem process will stick around after the command finishes
> > and you might have to kill it.
>
> Indeed, this is what happens.
>
> >
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 06:58:59PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I suspect that presently if you use this (assuming settrans works right),
> that the filesystem process will stick around after the command finishes
> and you might have to kill it.
Indeed, this is what happens.
> If that happens,
> Sorry, I assumed that it was a mistake was in my code; Should I report
> it to the gdb people?
Well, the "gdb people" for the Hurd is Mark.
> Here is what gdb said:
> (gdb) p _hurd_init
> _hurd_init _hurd_init_dtable _hurd_init_dtablesize
See, I told you I got the name wrong.
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 02:33:53AM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > First, please check whether the scenario you are trying does or doesn't
> > > exhibit the same bug in a vanilla system without your changes.
> >
> > The exact same error.
>
> Well, you certainly could have saved some wild goo
> > First, please check whether the scenario you are trying does or doesn't
> > exhibit the same bug in a vanilla system without your changes.
>
> The exact same error.
Well, you certainly could have saved some wild goose chases by making that
clear in the first place.
> It is blocked in the c
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 05:44:13PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> This is pretty confusing to me, but it's hard to see much without being
> able to debug it myself.
>
> First, please check whether the scenario you are trying does or doesn't
> exhibit the same bug in a vanilla system without your
This is pretty confusing to me, but it's hard to see much without being
able to debug it myself.
First, please check whether the scenario you are trying does or doesn't
exhibit the same bug in a vanilla system without your changes.
Next, here are some things to try. When you attach gdb, look a
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:00:43PM -0500, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 06:21:40PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I don't see anything obviously wrong (other than your spelling of "semantics").
>
> Do you think it might be an error elsewhere, e.g. in gdb or the proc
> server?
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 06:21:40PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I don't see anything obviously wrong (other than your spelling of "semantics").
Do you think it might be an error elsewhere, e.g. in gdb or the proc
server?
PGP signature
I don't see anything obviously wrong (other than your spelling of "semantics").
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Here are all the changes:
diff -rNu --exclude libtrivfs hurd-2115/daemons/ChangeLog hurd/daemons/ChangeLog
--- hurd-2115/daemons/ChangeLog Tue Sep 28 09:17:24 1999
+++ hurd/daemons/ChangeLog Wed Jan 17 01:47:53 2001
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2001-01-17 Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTE
16 matches
Mail list logo
