Am Donnerstag, 31. Dezember 2009 03:46:31 schrieb
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> My remark probably was actually a bit premature: I fear xz-utils
are not
> yet easily available in stable distributions; so people might have
> trouble reading .xz file if you send them out...
xz-utils have been giving
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 03:19:26PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 06:12:14PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > Try xz compression instead of bz2 -- that can make quite a
> > difference :-)
>
> Wow! :-) Thank you! I've heard about the LZMA algorithm, but it's
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 06:14:10PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 06:32:41PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:51:16PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> > wrote:
>
> > > These are probably all related. It's all part of the network
>
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 06:12:14PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:01:50PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > As I said on the IRC, I planned to send you the repository by E-mail,
> > but the size of the (archived) version is 20MB, which is bad.
>
> Did y
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 02:16:40PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 06:32:41PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:51:16PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> >> wrote:
> >>> These are probably all related. It's all part
Hi,
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 06:32:41PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:51:16PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
>> wrote:
>
>>> These are probably all related. It's all part of the network
>>> virtualization project.
>> I see. The
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 06:32:41PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:51:16PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > These are probably all related. It's all part of the network
> > virtualization project.
>
> I see. The question, then, is whether it is appropriat
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:01:50PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> As I said on the IRC, I planned to send you the repository by E-mail,
> but the size of the (archived) version is 20MB, which is bad.
Did you do "make clean" and "git gc"?
> Therefore I've uploaded the archive to flubber, and
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 05:44:20PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > I see. The question, then, is whether it is appropriate to push the
> > whole Hurd source tree with Zheng's changes to the incubator, or
> > would it be better to have a separate repository for that?
> >
Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:51:16PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:25:51PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>>
>>> but looking at the commit history in your hurd.git repository, I can
>>> see that there are commits concerning the mul
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 08:42:30AM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
>
> How do you get my Hurd.git repository? In it, is there history of
> eth-multiplexer development? I don't have any eth-multiplexer
> development history in my own git repository.
As I said on the IRC, I planned to send you the r
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:51:16PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:25:51PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > but looking at the commit history in your hurd.git repository, I can
> > see that there are commits concerning the multiplexer and other parts
> >
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:25:51PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> but looking at the commit history in your hurd.git repository, I can
> see that there are commits concerning the multiplexer and other parts
> of the Hurd (like boot and filter) mingled.
These are probably all related. It's all
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 07:51:35PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> > You can find the patches in the bug-hurd mailing list archives:
> >
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2009-08/msg00056.html
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2009-08/msg00053.html
> I think your patch is
Hi,
Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>> Can you push eth-multiplexer to incubator? If you do so, will you
>> have its development history?
>
> Hm, I'm afraid my answer will be negative :-( True, I have pushed a
> project to the incubator with Thomas's detailed help, but looking at
> the commit history in you
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 07:51:35PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> >
> > You can find the patches in the bug-hurd mailing list archives:
> >
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2009-08/msg00056.html
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2009-08/msg00053
Hi,
Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> You can find the patches in the bug-hurd mailing list archives:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2009-08/msg00056.html
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2009-08/msg00053.html
I think your patch is good:-)
>
> I've created two patch series in
Hello, Zheng
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 01:36:25AM -0500, Zheng Da wrote:
> antrik asked me to give your modifications on eth-multiplexer some
> review. could you please tell what the interface of eth-multiplexer is
> adopted and whether you have uploaded those changes in some online
> repository?
N
18 matches
Mail list logo
