At 26 Jul 2004 16:07:27 -0700,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think we should just remove those inline functions, because it's
> > dubious whether they are a really faster and they do break
> > things. What do you think?
>
> How on earth is it
Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think we should just remove those inline functions, because it's
> dubious whether they are a really faster and they do break
> things. What do you think?
How on earth is it dubious if they are really faster?
Quoting Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is there anyone working on pthreads? If not I want to try to finish it.
> (I have holidays this week. :) I already got the code from the
> sourceforgetit CVS.
All I can say is that I'm not working on it at the moment (or anything
Hurd related for tha
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 05:09:09PM +0100, Erik Verbruggen wrote:
> I checked the *hurd archives, and as far as I can see, no-one is working
> on pthreads for Hurd. Is that right? If this is the case, I hereby
> volonteer to write a pthread-to-cthread wrapper "package". As far as I
> can see, this
