Hi,
Michael Casadevall, le Fri 03 Aug 2007 21:46:54 -0400, a écrit :
> The first thing you'll notice is a distinct lack of times.
Times are in seconds. So you need to do something that takes more than a
cent of second to actually see anything, e.g. untar gcc.tgz.
Samuel
___
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In general, what's most useful to profile are real programs running real
> workloads to see what spots actually matter in practice. Profiling
> targetted benchmarks (like the fork tester) mostly just confirms the
> spots of slowness you already know a
> Yep, builds gcrt0.o as it should. Haven't tried a make install, but that's
> a no-brainer.
I've checked in changes to the libc makefiles (I did some cleanup in the
process of making gcrt0.o get built and installed). I did a build, but you
should test it too, and I'll surely hear about it if I
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 07:36:23PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > The specs file implement the following option combinations:
> > Notes: -shared overrides (and prevents) profiling options.
> >-profile forces to link the profiling C library statically
> >-pg/-p does link to the no
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 06:20:50PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Well, I'm not quite sure how to react to this. I'm not exactly surprised
> that there is a problem. Frankly, I'm somewhat surprised that profiling
> actually does work at all, and I'm having a hard time taking this bug
> report as
> The specs file implement the following option combinations:
> Notes: -shared overrides (and prevents) profiling options.
>-profile forces to link the profiling C library statically
>-pg/-p does link to the normal C library (dynamically or statically)
Is this the same as Linux?
Well, I'm not quite sure how to react to this. I'm not exactly surprised
that there is a problem. Frankly, I'm somewhat surprised that profiling
actually does work at all, and I'm having a hard time taking this bug
report as anything but good news. :-)
> However, we don't use crt1.o for static
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 08:54:21PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> when I try to compile a small test program with -pg, I get
> a statically linked exectuable (-lc_p) which is "Killed" in _start (c_p I
> have here is without debugging symbols, so I don't know where in _start, but
> the address wa
