Re: Passive translators (was: [PATCH] procfs: Ignore arguments for compatibility with Linux' procfs.)

2013-07-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thomas Schwinge, le Tue 09 Jul 2013 15:40:18 +0200, a écrit : > Is the passive translator setting meant to go away then? Nope. But concerning Debian, it'll be easier for maintenance of the "standard" places (/proc, /tmp, etc.) to use active translators started at root, to avoid differing too much

Re: Passive translators

2013-07-09 Thread Justus Winter
Hi Thomas :) Quoting Thomas Schwinge (2013-07-09 15:40:18) > Hi! > > On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:00:00 +0200, Justus Winter > <4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote: > > Quoting Pino Toscano (2013-07-09 10:52:56) > > > Alle martedì 9 luglio 2013, Justus Winter ha scritto: > > > > Ignore the --node

Re: passive translators

2007-06-21 Thread Wei Shen
Hi, > I proposed two solutions in last mail. In solution a), the translator is > > started chrooted. So the file node, parent, and target are > respectively: > > /foo, /, and / in its eyes; and /chroot/foo, /chroot, and /chroot in > > reality. > > > I am not sure if this translator can still ser

Re: passive translators

2007-06-21 Thread Wei Shen
On 6/21/07, Neal H. Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I got it. I will consider to support the file descriptor reprentation, > but will not implement complex semantics as redirection first. Redirection is a shell feature. If you support the file descriptor representation, then you can

Re: passive translators

2007-06-21 Thread Neal H. Walfield
At Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:02:35 +0800, Wei Shen wrote: > > On 6/21/07, Neal H. Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > At Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:37:49 +0800, > > > Could you please give some explanation on "PFINETSERVER=fd:3 myprog > > > 3 > > > From the bash manual: > > > > 3.6.1 Redirecting Input

Re: passive translators

2007-06-21 Thread Wei Shen
On 6/21/07, Neal H. Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:37:49 +0800, > Could you please give some explanation on "PFINETSERVER=fd:3 myprog > 3 Ok, I got it. I will consider to support the file descriptor reprentation, but will not implement complex semantics as redirecti

Re: passive translators

2007-06-21 Thread Neal H. Walfield
At Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:37:49 +0800, Wei Shen wrote: > > Hi, > > Could you please give some explanation on "PFINETSERVER=fd:3 myprog > 3http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bashref.html#SEC38 So, as bash starts myprog, it opens /path/to/pfinet and inserts the resulting file descriptor into the

Re: passive translators

2007-06-21 Thread Wei Shen
Hi, Could you please give some explanation on "PFINETSERVER=fd:3 myprog 3 wrote: There is a bit of confusion here, I'm going to try to be more specific, please indulge me. Thanks! The translator needs not to know whether a process is chrooted or not, it > just always adds (for any process)