Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes. While we are at it, do I have to define my own diskfs_init_dir, too?
> It increases nlink for . and .., and checks the number of allowed links for
> the parent directory for the latter. (if yes, this should probably be added
> to the info doc on
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 04:49:50PM -0400, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Mmmh. Assume a rename happens while there is an open file handle.
> > What happens if then fsys_getfile is called, which does an lookup_hard on
> > the cache_id in the file h
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mmmh. Assume a rename happens while there is an open file handle.
> What happens if then fsys_getfile is called, which does an lookup_hard on
> the cache_id in the file handle?
Rename has to change the cache_id in the file handle itself too.
Certain
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 08:09:36PM -0400, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > This is not a serious problem. If you choose this implementation, all
> > > you have to do is purge the cache of the changing id.
>
> > I am considering this, however,
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is not a serious problem. If you choose this implementation, all
> > you have to do is purge the cache of the changing id.
> I am considering this, however, I am a bit concerned about performance
> impact (as the name cache would become ef
On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 04:07:04PM -0400, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> > 2. Storing the location of the directory entry:
> > This is not constant under rename operations, thus it fails to fulfill
> > requirement two.
> > We could reflect this by changing the node cache, but we can't change the
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. Storing the beginning of the file on disk:
> This is a workable solution as long as you don't have zero bytes file, which
> don't have a unique beginning of the file (for example, start_cluster for
> all FAT zero files is cluster 0). So, this viol
On Wed, 10 May 2000 04:15:33 Brent Fulgham wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 01:33:11AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > maybe my ramblings will be useful for other inodeless fs implementations
> > later.
> >
> > 3. Making up inode numbers on the way:
> > Simply start with 1 and go
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 01:33:11AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> maybe my ramblings will be useful for other inodeless fs implementations
> later.
>
> 3. Making up inode numbers on the way:
> Simply start with 1 and go up for every new file cached. This could be
> called "virtual inod
Hi Marcus,
> 3. Making up inode numbers on the way:
> Simply start with 1 and go up for every new file cached. This could be
> called "virtual inodes". The problem is that there is per se no efficient way
> to regain the virtual inode numbers from the file information, when looking it
> up (The a
10 matches
Mail list logo
