Re: libiohelp

2002-11-01 Thread James Morrison
--- "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I tried ti build current hurd pachage with current gcc 3.2.1. I needed > > the attached patch to make it compile. Please review and apply it. > > I have no objection to this; it's annoying in

Re: libiohelp

2002-11-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I tried ti build current hurd pachage with current gcc 3.2.1. I needed > the attached patch to make it compile. Please review and apply it. I have no objection to this; it's annoying in the extreme that gcc has broken compatibility here, but so be it.

Re: libiohelp

2002-10-29 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:21:39AM -0800, James Morrison wrote: > > Isnt there someone else then the above three persons who are allowed > > to commit this ? > See http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/hurd There's a difference between those of us who have CVS commit priviledges and those who have

Re: libiohelp

2002-10-29 Thread James Morrison
--- Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isnt there someone else then the above three persons who are allowed > to commit this ? See http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/hurd > > I wonder why this bug is known/reported for more then three months and > nobody fixed it. > > > Michael

Re: libiohelp

2002-10-29 Thread Moritz Schulte
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I wonder why this bug is known/reported for more then three months > and nobody fixed it. It was fixed for quite some time, but now the bug is back it seems. It would be good, if somebody could apply that trivial fix soon... moritz -- [

Re: libiohelp

2002-10-29 Thread Michael Koch
Am Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2002 18:28 schrieb Jeff Bailey: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:07:26AM -0800, James Morrison wrote: > > Humm, I wonder if someone besides me submits this patch that it > > will be applied. > > Convince Thomas to apply it. =) Roland and Marcus certainly won't > do it this wee

Re: libiohelp

2002-10-29 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
Convince Thomas to apply it. =) Roland and Marcus certainly won't do it this week.. Or this year. :) ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: libiohelp

2002-10-29 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:07:26AM -0800, James Morrison wrote: > Humm, I wonder if someone besides me submits this patch that it will be > applied. Convince Thomas to apply it. =) Roland and Marcus certainly won't do it this week.. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- When you get to the heart, use a knife a

Re: libiohelp

2002-10-29 Thread James Morrison
--- Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello list, > > > I tried ti build current hurd pachage with current gcc 3.2.1. I needed > the attached patch to make it compile. Please review and apply it. > > > Michael Humm, I wonder if someone besides me submits this patch that it will be a

Re: libiohelp

2002-06-01 Thread James Morrison
--- "Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * James A Morrison writes: > > I tried to compile the Hurd, and it failed on libiohelp. I can't > remember > > the error message, but here is the fix. It wanted the declarations before > > the definitions of the functions. > > Could you try

Re: libiohelp

2002-06-01 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
* James A Morrison writes: > I tried to compile the Hurd, and it failed on libiohelp. I can't remember > the error message, but here is the fix. It wanted the declarations before > the definitions of the functions. Could you try to get the error message? I don't think that this should cause