Re: gnumach FTBFS: Was Re: Race condition in Mach/Hurd?

2011-05-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Thu 19 May 2011 10:17:16 +0200, a écrit : > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 09:57 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Samuel Thibault, le Fri 13 May 2011 21:12:43 +0200, a écrit : > > > This looks extremely odd. Labels like .L430 are not supposed to be > > > external symbols, but file-local

Re: gnumach FTBFS: Was Re: Race condition in Mach/Hurd?

2011-05-19 Thread Svante Signell
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 09:57 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Samuel Thibault, le Fri 13 May 2011 21:12:43 +0200, a écrit : > > This looks extremely odd. Labels like .L430 are not supposed to be > > external symbols, but file-local symbols. > > rgrep tells it's in liblinux.a_de4x5.o, objdump -x -D

Re: gnumach FTBFS: Was Re: Race condition in Mach/Hurd?

2011-05-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Fri 13 May 2011 21:12:43 +0200, a écrit : > This looks extremely odd. Labels like .L430 are not supposed to be > external symbols, but file-local symbols. rgrep tells it's in liblinux.a_de4x5.o, objdump -x -D tells it's in de4x5_alloc_rx_buff and the address. gdb's l * 0xaddre

Re: gnumach FTBFS

2011-05-18 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 16:54 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 15:25 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 13:35 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:18 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > ... > > > I have now completely disabled the wrapper,

Re: gnumach FTBFS

2011-05-18 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 23:39 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > At least we get rid of a lot of warnings when compiling, and according > > to the output no registers are used without the change?? Did you change > > that code, and if so how? > > No code change at all, it's just another way to expres

Re: gnumach FTBFS

2011-05-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Wed 18 May 2011 20:34:08 +0200, a écrit : > > Well, actually in that case it'll be the same. But it's much more clear > > to announce the memory as being both read&written ("+m") than announcing > > it as read and also as written ("m" and "=m"). > > Can you tell if the change ha

Re: gnumach FTBFS

2011-05-18 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 18:27 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le Wed 18 May 2011 17:41:50 +0200, a écrit : > > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 17:08 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Svante Signell, le Wed 18 May 2011 16:54:24 +0200, a écrit : > > .. > > > > Is this OK? There is also a simila

Re: gnumach FTBFS

2011-05-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Wed 18 May 2011 17:41:50 +0200, a écrit : > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 17:08 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, le Wed 18 May 2011 16:54:24 +0200, a écrit : > .. > > > Is this OK? There is also a similar case in the glibc code. > > > > Where? > > See below: Ok, the s

Re: gnumach FTBFS

2011-05-18 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 17:08 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le Wed 18 May 2011 16:54:24 +0200, a écrit : .. > > Is this OK? There is also a similar case in the glibc code. > > Where? See below: Changing "1" and "2" to "m" made the warnings disappear. But you say that this is not t

Re: gnumach FTBFS

2011-05-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Wed 18 May 2011 16:54:24 +0200, a écrit : > A question: I can avoid the warnings below by doing the following asm > change. I saw it somewhere on the web that people recommended this type > of change to enable the inline code go into a register. Does it make > sense (I don't reme

Re: gnumach FTBFS

2011-05-18 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 15:25 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 13:35 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:18 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > ... > > I have now completely disabled the wrapper, and the build problems > > remain. > > And building with -O0 does

Re: gnumach FTBFS

2011-05-18 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 13:35 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:18 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: ... > I have now completely disabled the wrapper, and the build problems > remain. And building with -O0 does not work either. i486-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -nostdinc -ima

Re: gnumach FTBFS

2011-05-18 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:18 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hallo! > Wait a moment... gcc-4.6.real. Is that still with the hardening-wrapper > package installed? -- OK... I should just continue reading your > email... :-) Yes, the wrapper is still installed. > > > With which CFLAGS does the

Re: gnumach FTBFS

2011-05-18 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hallo! On Wed, 18 May 2011 11:37:45 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 10:31 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Samuel Thibault, le Wed 18 May 2011 10:28:50 +0200, a écrit : > > > Svante Signell, le Sun 15 May 2011 11:11:41 +0200, a écrit : > > > > On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 00:26 +0

Re: gnumach FTBFS

2011-05-18 Thread Svante Signell
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 10:31 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Samuel Thibault, le Wed 18 May 2011 10:28:50 +0200, a écrit : > > Svante Signell, le Sun 15 May 2011 11:11:41 +0200, a écrit : > > > On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 00:26 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > > I run Hurd under qemu on a Debian GNU/

Re: gnumach FTBFS: Was Re: Race condition in Mach/Hurd?

2011-05-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 18 May 2011 10:28:50 +0200, a écrit : > Svante Signell, le Sun 15 May 2011 11:11:41 +0200, a écrit : > > On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 00:26 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > I run Hurd under qemu on a Debian GNU/Linux testing box. qemu-kvm > > > > version 0.14.0+dfsg-1~tls > >

Re: gnumach FTBFS: Was Re: Race condition in Mach/Hurd?

2011-05-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Sun 15 May 2011 11:11:41 +0200, a écrit : > On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 00:26 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > I run Hurd under qemu on a Debian GNU/Linux testing box. qemu-kvm > > > version 0.14.0+dfsg-1~tls > > > > Which precise version of gcc are you using? > > gcc --version >

Re: gnumach FTBFS: Was Re: Race condition in Mach/Hurd?

2011-05-15 Thread Svante Signell
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 00:26 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > I run Hurd under qemu on a Debian GNU/Linux testing box. qemu-kvm > > version 0.14.0+dfsg-1~tls > > Which precise version of gcc are you using? gcc --version gcc-4.6.real (Debian 4.6.0-6) 4.6.1 20110428 (prerelease)

Re: gnumach FTBFS: Was Re: Race condition in Mach/Hurd?

2011-05-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Sat 14 May 2011 11:16:26 +0200, a écrit : > On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 21:12 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, le Thu 12 May 2011 17:40:47 +0200, a écrit : > > > > Looks like gnumach-1.3.99.dfsg.git20110305 does not build from source > > > any longer: > > > make[3]: E

Re: gnumach FTBFS: Was Re: Race condition in Mach/Hurd?

2011-05-14 Thread Svante Signell
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 21:12 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le Thu 12 May 2011 17:40:47 +0200, a écrit : > > Looks like gnumach-1.3.99.dfsg.git20110305 does not build from source > > any longer: > > make[3]: Entering directory > > `/home/srs/DEBs/gnumach/gnumach-1.3.99.dfsg.git2011

Re: gnumach FTBFS: Was Re: Race condition in Mach/Hurd?

2011-05-13 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Thu 12 May 2011 17:40:47 +0200, a écrit : > On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 11:39 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, le Tue 10 May 2011 11:38:08 +0200, a écrit : > > > On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 18:43 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Svante Signell, le Mon 09 May 2011 18:33: