Re: fatfs checked in

2002-12-04 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:45:46PM +0100, M. Gerards wrote: > > > > There are still two locking problems. I'm working on those problems ATM. > > > Because of those problems fatfs will most likely freeze while testing it. > > > > Even in read-only mode? My understanding was that the locking prob

Re: fatfs checked in

2002-12-04 Thread M. Gerards
> > There are still two locking problems. I'm working on those problems ATM. > > Because of those problems fatfs will most likely freeze while testing it. > > Even in read-only mode? My understanding was that the locking problems only > occur when writing. Certainly the fatfs I wrote (0.2) wor

Re: fatfs checked in

2002-12-04 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:38:32AM +0100, M. Gerards wrote: > Citeren Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi, > > > > I checked in fatfs 0.4, made it read-only and enabled it in the Makefiles. > > It compiles but is not otherwise tested much. But this way everybody can > > check themsel

Re: fatfs checked in

2002-12-04 Thread M. Gerards
Citeren Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > I checked in fatfs 0.4, made it read-only and enabled it in the Makefiles. > It compiles but is not otherwise tested much. But this way everybody can > check themselves, and we can start to treat it like the other Hurd code. cool :) Ther