2011/12/30 Jérémie Koenig
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
> > [...], but I believe it's still a bit revealing: I had already noticed
> > that ext2fs spends most of its time in the kernel (like 90%), and it
> > here seems we're spending a lot of time just managing the
Jérémie Koenig, le Fri 30 Dec 2011 12:46:39 +0100, a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
> > [...], but I believe it's still a bit revealing: I had already noticed
> > that ext2fs spends most of its time in the kernel (like 90%), and it
> > here seems we're spending
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> [...], but I believe it's still a bit revealing: I had already noticed
> that ext2fs spends most of its time in the kernel (like 90%), and it
> here seems we're spending a lot of time just managing the ext2fs thread
> sleeps (no, there aren
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 29 Dec 2011 01:25:36 +0100, a écrit :
> It might be biaised by the clock not being able to tick everywhere in
> the kernel (though I guess e.g. most of the IPC machinery is running at
> ipl0?),
But the linux drivers do get an opportunity to run their bottom halves
etc. when
El Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:25:36 +0100
Samuel Thibault escribió:
> It might be biaised by the clock not being able to tick everywhere in
> the kernel (though I guess e.g. most of the IPC machinery is running
> at ipl0?), but I believe it's still a bit revealing: I had already
> noticed that ext2fs sp
Svante Signell, le Thu 29 Dec 2011 11:05:20 +0100, a écrit :
> On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 01:25 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > I've done some stat-based kernel profiling (I'll have to post how to do
> > it on the wiki sometime) on ext2fs doing nothing more than
> >
> > while true; do rm -f blop ; \c
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 01:25 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've done some stat-based kernel profiling (I'll have to post how to do
> it on the wiki sometime) on ext2fs doing nothing more than
>
> while true; do rm -f blop ; \cp -f blip blop ; done
> It might be biaised by the clock n