Re: diskfs_make_node

2002-05-11 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 12:15:00AM +0100, Neal H Walfield wrote: > > Those void functions you changed to error_t can never fail, so I don't see > > the point. The actual diskfs_make_node changes seem ok. > > They can never fail today, however, I thought it made the interface a > bit more consist

Re: diskfs_make_node

2001-11-16 Thread Neal H Walfield
> Those void functions you changed to error_t can never fail, so I don't see > the point. The actual diskfs_make_node changes seem ok. They can never fail today, however, I thought it made the interface a bit more consistent. I guess, however, you are right, there is no need. Here is revised p

Re: diskfs_make_node

2001-11-16 Thread Roland McGrath
Those void functions you changed to error_t can never fail, so I don't see the point. The actual diskfs_make_node changes seem ok. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd