Re: additional questions

2009-12-10 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2009 17:22:11 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net: > Unfortunately, we do not have any roadmap. This is, in part, because > people have different visions about where the project should go... But it is also because there are many areas which need work, and it's most efficient

Re: additional questions

2009-12-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Wed 09 Dec 2009 17:22:11 +0100, a écrit : > (Zheng Da is presently working on the driver issue -- let's see how it > works out :-) ) The cool thing being that that work would be independent from the microkernel! Samuel

Re: additional questions

2009-12-09 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 10:27:12PM +0100, Jakub Daniel wrote: > I read a paper about mach not being the best choice of microkernel for > hurd. There are various comments to that effect floating around the net -- some well-founded, some myths... > And I also know that viengoos has been in de