Hi,
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 12:39:47PM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> Is this little better? (have updated the image again):
> http://shakthimaan.com/downloads/hurd/gnu-hurd-mach-system-architecture.png
The current version is much more correct than the original, yes. (Not
totally precise in some
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 11:45:31PM -0800, Praveen A wrote:
> Glibc sits in between the userspace and mach. It provides the complete
> posix api on top of mach. So all the libraries and translators use
> glibc.
This statement is correct, but a bit misleading: glibc does not provide
the POSIX
2007/12/7, Shakthi Kannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your explanation.
>
> Is this little better? (have updated the image again):
> http://shakthimaan.com/downloads/hurd/gnu-hurd-mach-system-architecture.png
>
> The .dia image is available at:
> http://shakthimaan.com/downloads/hurd/
Hi,
Thanks for your explanation.
Is this little better? (have updated the image again):
http://shakthimaan.com/downloads/hurd/gnu-hurd-mach-system-architecture.png
The .dia image is available at:
http://shakthimaan.com/downloads/hurd/gnu-hurd-mach-system-architecture.dia
SK
--
Shakthi Kannan
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 01:48:36AM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> - On Dec 8, 2007 12:32 AM, Shakthi Kannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote: | I would like get a big picture on how servers, ports, message
> queues, | libraries, system calls, IPC, gnumach, drivers, hardware et.
> al. are | lay
Hi,
Replying to my own post:
- On Dec 8, 2007 12:32 AM, Shakthi Kannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I would like get a big picture on how servers, ports, message queues,
| libraries, system calls, IPC, gnumach, drivers, hardware et. al. are
| layered.
\--
Is this something close?
http://shak
