Re: Libc optimization patch

2001-12-02 Thread Roland McGrath
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 02:34:03PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > > Thanks, I put the fix in. > > I had to remove the comments you put in for the compile to procede. > Maybe move the comment up a few lines so it's not in the middle of a > statement? > > I've never tried putting a comment in th

Re: Libc optimization patch

2001-12-02 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 02:34:03PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > Thanks, I put the fix in. I had to remove the comments you put in for the compile to procede. Maybe move the comment up a few lines so it's not in the middle of a statement? I've never tried putting a comment in the middle of the

Re: Libc optimization patch

2001-12-02 Thread Roland McGrath
Thanks, I put the fix in. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: Libc optimization patch

2001-12-02 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 09:31:13PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > Sorry, can you refer me to the earlier problem report? > I don't remember why this matters. Detailed report follows. > Please always use diff -u or diff -c. I have added 'diff -c' to my .cvsrc file. Hope this helps. i386-pc-gnu

Re: Libc optimization patch

2001-12-01 Thread Roland McGrath
Sorry, can you refer me to the earlier problem report? I don't remember why this matters. Please always use diff -u or diff -c. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd