Re: GSoC: procfs implementation.

2008-05-13 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:43:13AM +0530, Madhusudan C.S wrote: > If we take the existing procfs code and then start migrating it to use > netfs, I may fear that it may not be possible everything in the > existing code be ported. Why? > But if we start writing everything from scratch, I fel

Re: GSoC: procfs implementation.

2008-05-12 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi Olaf, Well, in the end it is your decision... > > Would be nice though if you could explain why you think one way is > better than the other :-) What possible advantages and disadvantages do > you see in for each variant? > > IMHO there is no specific plus or minus as to why I should select one

Re: GSoC: procfs implementation.

2008-05-09 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 12:35:44AM +0530, Madhusudan C.S wrote: > The existing procfs code uses libtrivfs. So one of the goal's of my > GSoC project is to rewrite procfs so that uses libnetfs. During the > proposal submission stage, I had said that I will first port every > feature in the ex