Svante Signell, le Thu 18 Oct 2012 14:55:33 +0200, a écrit :
> > > POLLNVAL
> > > The specified fd value is invalid. This flag is only valid in
> > > the revents member; it shall ignored in the events member.
> > >
> > > Specifically, my interpretation of POLLNVAL is that it should
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 14:40 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Thu 18 Oct 2012 14:33:53 +0200, a écrit :
> > with errors specified by:
> >
> > ERRORS
>
> POSIX does not document all errors that may happen, it's completely
> valid to fail for other errors.
Yes, of course.
> > POL
Svante Signell, le Thu 18 Oct 2012 14:33:53 +0200, a écrit :
> with errors specified by:
>
> ERRORS
POSIX does not document all errors that may happen, it's completely
valid to fail for other errors.
> POLLNVAL
> The specified fd value is invalid. This flag is only valid in
> the
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 13:27 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Thu 18 Oct 2012 11:43:04 +0200, a écrit :
> > Remember: This was written a long time ago, why making a big issue of
> > it?
>
> >
> > POSIX does not specify to return EBAFD for the POLL case as for the
> > SELECT case.
Svante Signell, le Thu 18 Oct 2012 11:43:04 +0200, a écrit :
> Remember: This was written a long time ago, why making a big issue of
> it?
Because apparently your changes were made to fix an issue in ntpdate. So
we need to determine exactly what the fix should be.
> > The behavior of poll() on el
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 11:12 +0200, Richard Braun wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 09:13:28AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 23:40 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Svante Signell, le Fri 24 Aug 2012 04:52:15 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > - file descriptors w
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 09:13:28AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 23:40 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Svante Signell, le Fri 24 Aug 2012 04:52:15 +0200, a écrit :
> > > - file descriptors were read, sorted, and the good ones registered.
Why sorted ? How do
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 23:40 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Svante Signell, le Fri 24 Aug 2012 04:52:15 +0200, a écrit :
> > - file descriptors were read, sorted, and the good ones registered.
>
> I have to say I don't understand why doing it. If there is any file
> descriptor which is
Hello,
Svante Signell, le Fri 24 Aug 2012 04:52:15 +0200, a écrit :
> - file descriptors were read, sorted, and the good ones registered.
I have to say I don't understand why doing it. If there is any file
descriptor which is not valid, the whole call has to return EBADF,
that's what POSIX asks.
