Hi,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 04:50:56PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 08:48:34AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> What would have been a more appropriate problem to describe, would
> have been that if equality test were to be done in the sender (or the
> rece
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 08:48:34AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > Note also that it's possible for the sender to trick the receiver to
> > use objects the sender itself does not have access to, in ways they
> > are not expected to be used. Possibly leading to precious da
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:46:10PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> I guess this mail turned out to be more of a report on my findings
> rather than to start a discussion. So I'm mostly looking for
> feedback, e.g. if what I'm saying doesn't make sense, if one of my
> assumptions are wron
