Hello,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:22:42PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 08:03:30PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:21:13AM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > >
> > > I imagined that you'd only try to add an entry to one of the unioned
>
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:55:38PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:15:59PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
>
> > If run by any other user then it can only recreate the intersection of
> > credentials between unionfs and the client. This isn't ideal, but i
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 08:03:30PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:21:13AM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:15:16AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:29:40PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 1.
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:15:59PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> If run by any other user then it can only recreate the intersection of
> credentials between unionfs and the client. This isn't ideal, but it
> does ensure that unionfs doesn't accidentally grant the client any new
> perm
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:21:13AM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:15:16AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:29:40PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > >
> > > 1. Alice opens unionfs directory
> > > 2. unionfs opens unioned director
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:15:16AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:29:40PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> >
> > I don't so much want to create a new file access mechanism, as I
> > want to rely on the unioned directories own access mechanism, and let
> > them deci
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:29:40PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
>
> > > As explained above this assumes that the file permissions tell the
> > > whole story. The main problem with my suggestion is that it might be
> > > too restrictive. For instance, if user Alice wants to add an ent
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:21:18PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > > My idea was that a unionfs *run* by root can recreate any auth object
> > > > that the client has and then authenticate with it against the unioned
> > > > directories.
> > > >
> > > > If run by any other user then it can
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 07:20:03PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:49:24PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:15:59PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
>
> No, I think you're confusing authentication and access control.
> Authentication
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:49:24PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:15:59PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:57:46AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > > > On Thu, No
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:15:59PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:57:46AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 12:29:54PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > >
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:57:46AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 12:29:54PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, obviously, O_READ permission on a directory is sufficient to
>
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 12:29:54PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> >
> > > Well, obviously, O_READ permission on a directory is sufficient to
> > > create files in it.
> >
> > Ah, interesting...
> >
> > > I'm
13 matches
Mail list logo
