Re: [PATCH] libthreads: mutex_lock holder debugging

2010-09-03 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Sergio Lopez, le Fri 14 May 2010 12:35:41 +0200, a écrit : > The original WAIT_DEBUG code in libthreads records the > thread which is holding the lock, but this is not really usefull in > Hurd's translators, since that thread is probably waiting for another > message just as everyone else,

Re: [PATCH] libthreads: mutex_lock holder debugging

2010-05-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sergio Lopez, le Thu 20 May 2010 00:37:48 +0200, a écrit : > El Wed, 19 May 2010 16:27:07 +0200 > Samuel Thibault escribió: > > > Hello, > > > > Sergio Lopez, le Fri 14 May 2010 12:35:41 +0200, a écrit : > > > I've preferred to create a new definition conditional instead of > > > using WAIT_DEBU

Re: [PATCH] libthreads: mutex_lock holder debugging

2010-05-19 Thread Sergio Lopez
El Wed, 19 May 2010 16:27:07 +0200 Samuel Thibault escribió: > Hello, > > Sergio Lopez, le Fri 14 May 2010 12:35:41 +0200, a écrit : > > I've preferred to create a new definition conditional instead of > > using WAIT_DEBUG, since this one changes cproc_t structure size. > > Mmm, I don't think i

Re: [PATCH] libthreads: mutex_lock holder debugging

2010-05-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Sergio Lopez, le Fri 14 May 2010 12:35:41 +0200, a écrit : > I've preferred to create a new definition conditional instead of using > WAIT_DEBUG, since this one changes cproc_t structure size. Mmm, I don't think it'd be a problem, since the cproc_t structure is not exposed to users of libt