Hi,
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:37:25PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> El Fri, 14 May 2010 06:41:13 +0200 escribió:
> > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:48:12AM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> > > I suggest to change m_o_terminate simpleroutine, so it won't
> > > transfer memory object control port receive
El Fri, 14 May 2010 06:41:13 +0200
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:48:12AM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote:
>
> [...]
> > I suggest to change m_o_terminate simpleroutine, so it won't
> > transfer memory object control port receive right to the external
> > memory manager, deallocating
Hi,
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:48:12AM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote:
[...]
> I suggest to change m_o_terminate simpleroutine, so it won't transfer
> memory object control port receive right to the external memory
> manager, deallocating it in the kernel instead.
Unfortunately I do not understand en
Hello,
When a memory object is being terminated (because a change in its
"can_persist" attribute or being cleaned from cache), GNU Mach calls
memory_object_terminate. This simpleroutine, sends Mach's receive
right on memory object control port to the external memory manager. In
Hurd, a translator
