On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Olaf Buddenhagen
wrote:
> I'm a bit confused here: my understanding was that you essentially
> wanted to implement a "single system instance" cluster. I would have
> thought that would imply only a single instance of most servers --
> including auth -- rather than
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 09:52:38PM +0200, Olaf Buddenhagen wrote:
> I'm a bit confused here: my understanding was that you essentially
> wanted to implement a "single system instance" cluster. I would have
> thought that would imply only a single instance of most servers --
> including auth -- rath
Olaf Buddenhagen, on Mon 19 Sep 2016 21:52:38 +0200, wrote:
> Note that for the container solutions (lightweight virtualisation) I'm
> envisioning for the Hurd -- with things like sub-users -- we are likely
> to need some kind of auth delegation scheme or something like that;
Well, AIUI we already
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 10:29:54PM -1000, Brent W. Baccala wrote:
> Here's my proposal for dealing with the authentication issue.
>
> There should be an extra send right passed from the auth server, to the
> client, that the client then passes along to the server in its
> authentication requ
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 10:29:54PM -1000, Brent W. Baccala wrote:
> For those of you who have followed my netmsg threads, you may remember that
> there were two major issues when I first got it running. One was
> libpager's lack of multi-client support, which has been discussed at
> length, and th
Aloha -
For those of you who have followed my netmsg threads, you may remember that
there were two major issues when I first got it running. One was
libpager's lack of multi-client support, which has been discussed at
length, and the other was authentication, which we haven't discussed at all.
H
