Sending what I have so far. Hopefully I'll be able to read any comments next
wek.
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 10:22:09AM -0500, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> > > not conform to the GNU coding standards; this will have to be fixed.
It probably still does not, I'll have to read the GCS carefully when
I have
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 08:59:30PM -0500, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> > I tried to make it return errno and be async-cancel resistant.
>
> Why do you want it to be async-cancel resistant? The functions are
> not defined as being async-cancel safe; only pthread_cancel,
> pthread_setcancelstate and p
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:06:08PM +0100, Ga?l Le Mignot wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> While trying to compile abiword, and so gnome-vfs, on GNU/Hurd, I've
> seen that it uses POSIX semaphore, that we don't implement yet.
>
> So, I've done an implementation of POSIX semaphores using a pthread_mutex
> an
> int
> sem_init (sem_t *sem, int pshared, unsigned int value)
> {
> if (pshared)
> return -1;
Set errno to ENOTSUP.
> sem = malloc (sizeof (*sem));
> if (sem == NULL)
> return -1;
This is not going to work at all. SEM is a local variable; If you are
going to continue with this m
It seems I overlooked this attachment in my last email. Sorry.
> #ifndef _SEMAPHORE_H
> #define _SEMAPHORE_H 1
>
> #include
POSIX says you must include and .
>
> __BEGIN_DECLS
>
> struct __sem_t
> {
> unsigned int count;
> pthread_mutex_t count_lock;
> pthread_cond_t lock;
> };
Th
> > int
> > sem_init (sem_t *sem, int pshared, unsigned int value)
> > {
> > if (pshared)
> > return -1;
>
> If you wanted to be consistant with LinuxThreads this should be
> if (pshared)
> {
> errno = ENOSYS;
> return -1;
> }
> However, I think it would be better to actually
--- Ga�l Le Mignot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sun, 27 Oct 2002 20:10:24 +0100, tu as dit :
> >>> if (pshared)
> >>> return -1;
>
> >> If you wanted to be consistant with LinuxThreads this should be
> >> if (pshared)
> >> {
> >> errno = ENOSYS;
> >> return -1;
> >> }
>
> > I know
Sun, 27 Oct 2002 20:10:24 +0100, tu as dit :
>>> if (pshared)
>>> return -1;
>> If you wanted to be consistant with LinuxThreads this should be
>> if (pshared)
>> {
>> errno = ENOSYS;
>> return -1;
>> }
> I know we should do that, but
ooops ! I forgot to finish my sentence. What I wa
Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:57:08 -0800 (PST), tu as dit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> While trying to compile abiword, and so gnome-vfs, on GNU/Hurd, I've
>> seen that it uses POSIX semaphore, that we don't implement yet.>
>> So, I've done an implementation of POSIX semaphores using a pthread_mutex
>> and
--- Ga�l Le Mignot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> While trying to compile abiword, and so gnome-vfs, on GNU/Hurd, I've
> seen that it uses POSIX semaphore, that we don't implement yet.>
> So, I've done an implementation of POSIX semaphores using a pthread_mutex
> and a pthread_con
Hello,
While trying to compile abiword, and so gnome-vfs, on GNU/Hurd, I've
seen that it uses POSIX semaphore, that we don't implement yet.
So, I've done an implementation of POSIX semaphores using a pthread_mutex
and a pthread_cond. I didn't test it yet, but it compiles, and I'm pretty
confiden
11 matches
Mail list logo
