Re: Out-of-Line memory deallocation: MIG vs. glibc

2006-04-12 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi again, On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:57:21PM -0400, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 01:32:17AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > so many [port rights for the fdarray[] argument] that they are > > automatically transferred out-of-line, which is one of the > > conditions causin

Re: Out-of-Line memory deallocation: MIG vs. glibc

2006-04-12 Thread olafBuddenhagen
And a last "Hi again" On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 06:45:04AM -0400, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Now we have to figure out if the new fakeroot actually only obfuscates > the issues you uncovered, which might very well be, because of the > radically decreased (factor 300) `fdslen'. I'm not sure what you

Hurd fakeroot (was: Re: Out-of-Line memory deallocation: MIG vs. glibc)

2006-04-12 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:57:21PM -0400, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Uh, and what's up with the example in the middle? > > #v+ > [...] > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/ext2fs/filesystem.0.i$ cat echo_args > #!/bin/sh > > echo $# "$@" > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/ext2fs/filesystem.0.i$ sh -c `pwd`/echo_

fakeroot-tcp (Re: Out-of-Line memory deallocation: MIG vs. glibc)

2006-04-12 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi again, On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 06:45:04AM -0400, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/ext2fs/filesystem.0.i$ while fakeroot-tcp sh -c > `pwd`/ping > /dev/null; do date; done [...] > I stopped this experiment after a few minutes, because of ... > > #v+ > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ps -A

Re: Out-of-Line memory deallocation: MIG vs. glibc

2006-04-11 Thread Thomas Schwinge
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:57:21PM -0400, I wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/ext2fs/filesystem.0.i$ fakeroot-tcp sh -c `pwd`/echo\ > foo > err = 0 fdslen = 925 > foo > Might this actually be a fakeroot-tcp (which is from the Debian fakeroot > package) problem? That's indeed the answer to this is

Re: Out-of-Line memory deallocation: MIG vs. glibc

2006-04-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 01:32:17AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > A while back, Michael observed that building the debian package of > zaptel regularily causes the FS in the build chroot to crash. I could > reproduce that on my system, and tried to hunt down the problem. Thanks for doing this!

Out-of-Line memory deallocation: MIG vs. glibc

2006-04-09 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, A while back, Michael observed that building the debian package of zaptel regularily causes the FS in the build chroot to crash. I could reproduce that on my system, and tried to hunt down the problem. I reduced the testcase to simply fakeroot-tcp sh -c $suid_binary Most of the time this