Hi,
Here are the revised tasks. Now I've split them up and added more
information. Can someone please read it to see if it makes sense,
especially the locking stuff? (I know how it works, so I easily think
it is clear).
The new tasks for fatfs:
(Partially) ignore some unsupported calls
Fatfs ca
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 12:46:27AM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> > > priority: 6
> > > difficulty: 3
> > >
> > > When the exec server dies it is impossibly to start a
> > > program. libdiskfs should handle dead name notifications to find out
> > > if the exec server died and alert the user.
> >
>
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 01:18:20AM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> > I've included some descriptions I wrote with this mail, I've also
> > written a new task for fatfs. I just called this item "Fix writing
> > support", which includes many small tasks.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 01:18:20AM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> I've included some descriptions I wrote with this mail, I've also
> written a new task for fatfs. I just called this item "Fix writing
> support", which includes many small tasks. Is it better to divide this
> task in many small tasks
Marco,
For the most part this looks great. I have added a few comments inline.
Marco Gerards wrote:
Hi,
The items in the task/todo list are really confusing to people new to
the Hurd. I'd like to change that by putting a more detailed
description of these items on savannah.
I've included some
Hi,
The items in the task/todo list are really confusing to people new to
the Hurd. I'd like to change that by putting a more detailed
description of these items on savannah.
I've included some descriptions I wrote with this mail, I've also
written a new task for fatfs. I just called this item "F
