Hello,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:29 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 08:15:10PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:13 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > These could be put in a completely separate interface for translator
> > > control. But it mi
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 08:15:10PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:13 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:01:27PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > These could be put in a completely separate interface for translator
> > control. But it might be
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:13 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:01:27PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > Frankly speaking, I still have no idea as to the communication between
> > the proxy and the translators it loads. I suppose the proxy will have
> > to exhibit a
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:01:27PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:19 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frankly speaking, I still have no idea as to the communication between
> the proxy and the translators it loads. I suppose the proxy will have
> to exhibit an interf
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:19 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:21:10PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > Normal translators like "gunzip" would just use the underlying node
> > > directly, forming an ordinary translator stack. Filter translators
> > > on the othe
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:21:10PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:13 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Nevertheless, there is a lot of merit in your observation: I realise
> > now that there is really no reason to externally classify the
> > translators, and attach th
Hello,
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:13 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note that the virtual nodes are always created on demand, the moment
> they are accessed; so you would never actually create both variants up
> front. But conceptually, you indeed could think of two virtual nodes
> used alternati
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 07:50:14PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:10 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "-u" is more tricky that "-gunzip", as it doesn't skip one specific
> > translator, but rather filters a whole class. While it is certainly
> > possible to implement
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:10 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "-u" is more tricky that "-gunzip", as it doesn't skip one specific
> translator, but rather filters a whole class. While it is certainly
> possible to implement this also by means of a generic filter translator
> with some more
Hi,
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:40:09PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 6:32 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > However, the matter about ignoring some translators ('-u', for
> > > instance) is a bit foggy for me. Do you mean that these should
> > > also be symbolic links?
Hello
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 6:32 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, the matter about ignoring some translators ('-u', for
> > instance) is a bit foggy for me. Do you mean that these should also be
> > symbolic links?
>
> That would be one of the implementation methods I suggested: Link
Hi,
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 07:23:49PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 8:49 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, which would be the average size of a translator stack in
> your opinion? I don't think my assessment of the situation is really
> well-founded, by I suppo
Hello,
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 8:49 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I already suggested, at least for the prototype, I believe it can be
> implemented as a proxy which mirrors the underlying file system, and
> does it's magic whenever a virtual file with the special suffix is
> accessed.
>
>
Hi,
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 06:50:47PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:07 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The idea is much clearer for me now :-) As far as I can understand,
> the namespace-based translator selection will _not_ modify the
> filesystem permanently. Instead
Hello,
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:07 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If the user tries to access 'file1,u' a second time, nothing will
> > change, because a translator will have already been set on 'file1'.
> > Stacking of translators should be done in an explicit form, like
> > 'file1,u,x' (x
Hi,
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:46:16PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> If the user tries to access 'file1,u' a second time, nothing will
> change, because a translator will have already been set on 'file1'.
> Stacking of translators should be done in an explicit form, like
> 'file1,u,x' (x might me
Hello,
I've been thinking about my project recently and would like both to make my
ideas known and to find out where they have weak points :-)
I suggest creating a libnetfs-based translator which will be set on a
directory and will allow the user to access files with special names like
'file1,u'.
17 matches
Mail list logo
