Re: Mach ports use

2002-11-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels Möller) writes: > And for high performance, I suspect the right way to do it is to share > some buffer space (preferably shared all the way down to the > network card), and send a messages when a packet is written to the > buffer, and when a packet have been completely pro

Re: Mach ports use

2002-10-29 Thread Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:53:27PM +0100, Niels Möller wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neal H. Walfield) writes: > > > The client would make a container containing the pages and give the > > server access to the container. Then the server would map the pages > > in the container, build a packet and s

Re: Mach ports use

2002-10-28 Thread Niels Möller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neal H. Walfield) writes: > The client would make a container containing the pages and give the > server access to the container. Then the server would map the pages > in the container, build a packet and send it down the network. Upon > return, the client could reject the ser

Re: Mach ports use

2002-10-28 Thread Neal H. Walfield
> > As far as Hurd/L4 is concerned, mono-directional ports > > are the only possible alternative. > > And for high performance, I suspect the right way to do it is to share > some buffer space (preferably shared all the way down to the > network card), and send a messages when a packet is written

Re: Mach ports use

2002-10-28 Thread Niels Möller
Farid Hajji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As far as Hurd/L4 is concerned, mono-directional ports > are the only possible alternative. And for high performance, I suspect the right way to do it is to share some buffer space (preferably shared all the way down to the network card), and send a messa

Re: Mach ports use

2002-10-27 Thread Farid Hajji
> To communicate between two translators, is it better to have one > bi-directional port, or to have two mono-directional ports ? What are > the advantages/issues of these both ways ? Which ones allows (in theory) > the highest rate of data transfert ? > I think two ports can be better (it is for n

Mach ports use

2002-10-27 Thread Olivier Péningault
I have a question about the best way to use Mach ports. To communicate between two translators, is it better to have one bi-directional port, or to have two mono-directional ports ? What are the advantages/issues of these both ways ? Which ones allows (in theory) the highest rate of data transfert