On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:38:22PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 05:54:22PM -0400, Igor Khavkine wrote:
>
> > > I had never anticipated anyone trying to implement pthreads for the Hurd
> > > in any way but by a substantial rewrite of the libc hurd code.
> >
> > When pthread
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 05:54:22PM -0400, Igor Khavkine wrote:
> > I had never anticipated anyone trying to implement pthreads for the Hurd
> > in any way but by a substantial rewrite of the libc hurd code.
>
> When pthreads will actually be implemented. Do you think it would
> be a good idea to
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 03:57:53PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I had never anticipated anyone trying to implement pthreads for the Hurd
> > in any way but by a substantial rewrite of the libc hurd code.
>
> When pthreads will actually be implemented. Do you think it would
> be a good idea
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 03:57:53PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I had never anticipated anyone trying to implement pthreads for the Hurd
> in any way but by a substantial rewrite of the libc hurd code.
When pthreads will actually be implemented. Do you think it would
be a good idea to rewrite t
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 03:57:53PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I had never anticipated anyone trying to implement pthreads for the Hurd
> in any way but by a substantial rewrite of the libc hurd code.
Ah, okay. My initial thought had been to simply take MIT pthreads or
something like that, an
I had never anticipated anyone trying to implement pthreads for the Hurd
in any way but by a substantial rewrite of the libc hurd code.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
I've been hacking a bit at the pthreads problem.
If(when) I get this right, should I do anything to be careful of the
interaction between pthreads and cthreads? I notice that most of
glibc is reasonably oblivious to threads, but the hurd directories use
them alot. I'm concerned that the underly
