Hi,
I was going to refute your suggestion of ioctl handlers, but in arguing
about it back and forth with myself, I ended up agreeing with you. ;-)
As such this mail became a good bit longer than intended, feel free to
just skim through most of this first part.
I will answer the rest of your mail
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 02:17:59PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:39:51AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:54:53AM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> sorry for the late reply. I had written most of the mail quite a
> whil
Hi,
sorry for the late reply. I had written most of the mail quite a while
ago, except for the terminology discussion. Then I fell ill, and was
unable to complete that part, which I felt required a lot of concentration.
Then it took additional time to get back up on the horse and get back
into t
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:54:53AM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 01:11:09PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 06:56:15PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> I actually think we agree on what an object is: a bundle of state and
>
Hi,
this is just a small correction to my previous mail.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:54:53AM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> Take copy store as an example. The copy store makes a copy-on-write
> copy of another store and discards changes when closed. For instance,
> a copy store over a zero
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 01:11:09PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> BTW, it's rather sad that we already run into terminology issues
> again... We need to sort this out, to make a clear distinction between
> abstract objects and RPC objects.
>
> (Judging by the terminology used in libs
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 06:56:15PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 08:50:28AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > > I've split the project into three main parts: improving authority
> > > verification, improving code transfer and an object system that
> > >
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 08:50:28AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > I have dropped the channel concept and have opted to focus on
> > arbitrary Hurd objects. I've adopted term ``mobile object'' from
> > similar frameworks such as Java's RMI, where it is usually used when
> > the tran
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 10:24:33PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> I'll be starting my bachelor's thesis this semester and have decided
> to pick up where I left off with libchannel.
Great news :-)
> I've been planning this for a while, but didn't announce it until now
That's so wicked
Hello,
I'll be starting my bachelor's thesis this semester and have decided to
pick up where I left off with libchannel. (Not 100% sure if it's called
``bachelor's thesis'' in English, it's similar to a master's thesis except
that it for a bachelor's degree and gives half the amount of credits.)
10 matches
Mail list logo
