At Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:31:30 +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have to admit i am lost about the actual Hurd state.
That's arguably good news. When I joined the Hurd in 1997, there was
little doubt about the Hurd state at that time: It was just about at
the end of dieing a slow death.
I meant the installation guide should be updated. However, since
the tarball still exists, it shouldn't be updated the way I
expected, but by changing alpha.gnu.org to ftp.gnuab.org. I guess
it's still a good idea to mention crosshurd anyway.
Okie, anyone who would like to update the
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> 2 July 2003
> The tarball for Debian GNU/Hurd that Marcus Brinkmann made over
> the years has been discontinued in favour of Jeff Bailey's
> crosshurd package. To install Debian GNU/Hurd from now on, this
> package should be used. Anothe
That's all there is. The only mailinglist missing in that row is
commit-hurd.
You forgot web-hurd (and hurd-devel).
I said this before, but I will try to submit some stuff for
hurd.gnu.org and see if it will be approved. Hopefully more people
will join me.
Please do! And once a
Oliver Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:44:42 +0100
> Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It should be updated.
>
> These are things that can be done by a non-hacker. I have think about
> how could be done so, some times. But I can't filter what is a news that
> can
Is there a ML where such things are discuss or announced? I'm only
subscribed to bug-hurd, help-hurd and the Hurd-ML on Debian.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My opinion is, when a hacker release a piece of code, it should be
announced at www.gnu.org/software/hurd. Maybe not on the
frontpage(TM
If they don't want to help then that is our problem.
I still disagree, if people don't want to help we can't force them.
It is our problem however if we have people who wish to help, but for
some reason can't because we are to elitist.
Still I have a few notes (and I don't have time to fix
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:44:42 +0100
Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It should be updated.
These are things that can be done by a non-hacker. I have think about
how could be done so, some times. But I can't filter what is a news that
can be add to the page and what not.
Is there a ML where
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> What's new:
> > 2 July 2003
> > The tarball for Debian GNU/Hurd that Marcus Brinkmann made over
> > the years has been discontinued in favour of Jeff Bailey's
> > crosshurd package. To install Debian GNU/Hurd from now on, this
> > packa
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
There are very few hackers on the project, and that is a problem.
We can call it lack of their imagination, but it's our problem, not
theirs, so blaming them isn't going to help.
I disagree, it is not our problem that people don't want to hack.
We want the software
There are very few hackers on the project, and that is a problem.
We can call it lack of their imagination, but it's our problem, not
theirs, so blaming them isn't going to help.
I disagree, it is not our problem that people don't want to hack.
I think the main problem is PR: the webs
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
What is the problem with the Hurd? Lack of proper direction? Lack
of hackers? Lack of documentation? Lack of ...? What is the
problem, really? We need to know it in order to fix it.
There is no problem, but the lack of imagination from those who wish
to hack I think
I know this will require deep changes on the Hurd, and that it will
take time. But i am unable to find proper documentation/guidelines
for the task.
See the hurd-l4 module in the Hurd CVS repo.
- There are some official (commonly accepted) strategy for the Hurd
development?
Fix
yself at 2001). I even tried to contribute writing hush (an extension
for the bash shell supporting translators) and installing and testing
GNU/Hurd on several machines.
I have to admit i am lost about the actual Hurd state. I know mach has
been deprecated in order to take the advantages of a (supp
14 matches
Mail list logo
