Re: HRM: Moving library documentation into seperate files

2004-02-03 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:30:03PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: >> What do you all think about moving out all library parts into >> seperate files? > >I don't see a problem with this, though I also don't really know >the motivation for it. > > Cleanliness... There is a simple w

Re: HRM: Moving library documentation into seperate files

2004-02-02 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
What do you all think about moving out all library parts into seperate files? For example, moving the whole ihash section into libihash.texi, and then doing soemthing like: @node Integer Hash Library @section Integer Hash Library @include libihash.texi Seems that this isn't pos

Re: HRM: Moving library documentation into seperate files

2004-02-02 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
> What do you all think about moving out all library parts into > seperate files? I don't see a problem with this, though I also don't really know the motivation for it. Cleanliness... ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mai

Re: HRM: Moving library documentation into seperate files

2004-02-01 Thread Roland McGrath
> What do you all think about moving out all library parts into seperate > files? I don't see a problem with this, though I also don't really know the motivation for it. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/b

HRM: Moving library documentation into seperate files

2004-02-01 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
Hi, What do you all think about moving out all library parts into seperate files? For example, moving the whole ihash section into libihash.texi, and then doing soemthing like: @node Integer Hash Library @section Integer Hash Library @include libihash.texi When one wants to include it in the ma