Re: Getting a file_t from a file descriptor

2006-08-02 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 04:08:44PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Please tell if you (or anyone else, of course) need access to a GNU/Hurd > > system. > > I'm afraid it's a lot to learn all at once; That was meant to be a general offer (i.e. in

Re: Getting a file_t from a file descriptor

2006-07-29 Thread Paul Eggert
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I haven't had time (or a machine) to test the patch, but I don't see > any real reasons why it shouldn't. OK, thanks, I installed it. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mail

Re: Getting a file_t from a file descriptor

2006-07-20 Thread Paul Eggert
Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > While I'm not that proficient in these issues, Nor am i. > /* Return the io server port for file descriptor FD. >This adds a Mach user reference to the returned port. >On error, sets `errno' and returns MACH_PORT_NULL. */ Thanks, that looks

Getting a file_t from a file descriptor (was: Tiny error w.r.t. change from 2005-12-05)

2006-07-20 Thread Thomas Schwinge
[Cced to bug-hurd.] Hello! On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 08:45:37AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > Thanks for the fix. Sure, sure. :-) > By the way, is there some way in the Hurd to change the author of a > file, given only its Unix file descriptor? I'd like to fix the FIXME > about 5 lines before yo