Hello,
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:15 PM, wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:07:48PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:20 AM, wrote:
>
> > I mean, should we adopt the idea of taking a BSD kernel, throwing out
> > UNIX stuff, and implementing generic primitives as a possible
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:07:48PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:20 AM, wrote:
> I mean, should we adopt the idea of taking a BSD kernel, throwing out
> UNIX stuff, and implementing generic primitives as a possible roadmap.
> Working in this direction we could possib
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:20 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 08:43:43PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:25 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think Marek's work is interesting on several levels. For one, Mach
> > > was originally created by ta
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 08:43:43PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:25 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think Marek's work is interesting on several levels. For one, Mach
> > was originally created by taking a BSD kernel, throwing out the UNIX
> > stuff, and implem
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:25 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think Marek's work is interesting on several levels. For one, Mach was
> originally created by taking a BSD kernel, throwing out the UNIX stuff,
> and implementing some generic primitives (IPC, external pager interface)
> ins
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 09:25:58AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> BTW, after some pondering, I came to the conclusion that translators
> on NetBSD are not a very good sign for the Hurd community, because
> almost all PR actions Arne Babenhauserheide is undertaking are based
> on translators. I
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Marek Dopiera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Monday 17 of November 2008 14:34:23 Sergiu Ivanov napisał(a):
> > Well, I wonder whether porting Hurd to NetBSD kernel would take less
> > effort than it should have taken to port it to L4 or Coyotos. Still,
> > both attem
Monday 17 of November 2008 14:34:23 Sergiu Ivanov napisał(a):
> Well, I wonder whether porting Hurd to NetBSD kernel would take less
> effort than it should have taken to port it to L4 or Coyotos. Still,
> both attempts failed, and I am strongly inclined to think that it is
> just infeasible (or ne
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:19 AM, massimo s. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sergiu Ivanov ha scritto:
> > It might be interesting to you, that it's a trial to introduce the
> > translators
> > concept to NetBSD and the final goal is to provide binary
> > compatibility with
> > GN
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Marek Dopiera <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Saturday 08 of November 2008 07:28:17 Sergiu Ivanov napisał(a):
> > Please pardon me my question: why won't you contribute to Hurd
> > directly now? Especially that you have some experience with it ;-) I'm
> > just curiou
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 04:54:47PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> What I pursue with this question is whether a Gentoo GNU/Hurd would be
> easier to maintain up-to-date with usual Gentoo repositories and
> whether it would be possible to avoid situations like we are in at the
> moment: some pa
Saturday 08 of November 2008 07:28:17 Sergiu Ivanov napisał(a):
> Please pardon me my question: why won't you contribute to Hurd
> directly now? Especially that you have some experience with it ;-) I'm
> just curious, please don't think I meant something offensive with the
> inquiry.
>
Hi, unfortun
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 07:08:30AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > However, do you mean that I can download the sources of emacs22 and
> > they will build successfully on Hurd?
>
> Two weeks ago, that was the case:
>
> htt
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 07:08:30AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> However, do you mean that I can download the sources of emacs22 and
> they will build successfully on Hurd?
Two weeks ago, that was the case:
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/fetch.php?&pkg=emacs22&ver=22.2%2B2-4&arch=hurd-i386&stamp=1
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 08:23:41AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > I see... Well, I hope I'll have some time to port emacs to Hurd,
> > because, frankly speaking, it's uncomfortable for me to realize that
> > *GNU* Emacs do
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 08:23:41AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> I see... Well, I hope I'll have some time to port emacs to Hurd,
> because, frankly speaking, it's uncomfortable for me to realize that
> *GNU* Emacs does not run on *GNU* Hurd...
Maybe you're doing something wrong then, because GNU
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Marek Dopiera <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thursday 06 of November 2008 12:11:17 Matthew Ayres napisał(a):
> > Gentoo users are, naturally, more technically minded than users of
> > many distros (Debian possibly being an exception here). The Gentoo
> > meta-distro
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 06 November 2008 15:53:53 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > > And since ebuilds are very easy to maintain, it's far easier to keep a
> > > system
> > > current with them.
> >
> > Is there any advantage over D
Thursday 06 of November 2008 12:11:17 Matthew Ayres napisał(a):
> Gentoo users are, naturally, more technically minded than users of
> many distros (Debian possibly being an exception here). The Gentoo
> meta-distro is generally compiled from source and that naturally makes
> it more automatic for
Am Donnerstag 06 November 2008 15:53:53 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > And since ebuilds are very easy to maintain, it's far easier to keep a
> > system current with them.
>
> Is there any advantage over Debian binary packages when using ebuilds?
Yes. As example I attached the ebuild for "nano".
And
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Matthew Ayres
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > Sorry if the questions look senseless, I'm just trying to figure out
> > what could be the goal of developing Gentoo GNU/Hurd.
>
> Gentoo users are, naturally, more technically minded than users of
> many distros (Debian p
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 05 November 2008 21:38:09 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > Could you please tell me what Gentoo GNU/Hurd is exactly? Is it
> > something similar to Debian GNU/Hurd, with the difference that it will
> > have po
I'm planning to use Gentoo soon, so as someone who's done a lot of
research I'll stick my oar in.
> Is it
> something similar to Debian GNU/Hurd, with the difference that it will
> have portage, while Debian GNU/Hurd has apt?
Essentially yes, that's the nature of Gentoo. It allows compilation
fr
Am Mittwoch 05 November 2008 21:38:09 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> Could you please tell me what Gentoo GNU/Hurd is exactly? Is it
> something similar to Debian GNU/Hurd, with the difference that it will
> have portage, while Debian GNU/Hurd has apt?
Gentoo GNU/Hurd was/is a try at creating a Hurd Sys
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I just wanted to tell you that the Gentoo GNU/Hurd thread in Gentoo forums
> might be on its way to become active again:
>
Could you please tell me what Gentoo GNU/Hurd is exactly? Is it
somet
Hi,
I just wanted to tell you that the Gentoo GNU/Hurd thread in Gentoo forums
might be on its way to become active again:
- http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-41939.html
just skip to the last page to see current messages.
Best wishes,
Arne
--
-- My stuff: http://draketo.de - stories
26 matches
Mail list logo
