Hi,
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:43:13AM +0530, Madhusudan C.S wrote:
> If we take the existing procfs code and then start migrating it to use
> netfs, I may fear that it may not be possible everything in the
> existing code be ported.
Why?
> But if we start writing everything from scratch, I fel
Hi Olaf,
Well, in the end it is your decision...
>
> Would be nice though if you could explain why you think one way is
> better than the other :-) What possible advantages and disadvantages do
> you see in for each variant?
>
> IMHO there is no specific plus or minus as to why I should select one
Hi,
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 12:35:44AM +0530, Madhusudan C.S wrote:
> The existing procfs code uses libtrivfs. So one of the goal's of my
> GSoC project is to rewrite procfs so that uses libnetfs. During the
> proposal submission stage, I had said that I will first port every
> feature in the ex
Hi,
The existing procfs code uses libtrivfs. So one of the goal's of my
GSoC project is to rewrite procfs so that uses libnetfs. During the
proposal submission stage, I had said that I will first port every feature
in the existing code to use libnetfs and then start implementing the new
featu
