Re: GNU Mach 1.x patch

Jeff had some comments on my previous patch: http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2004-01/msg00090.html I did not change this because I do not have enough knowledge about autoconf. Is the patch ok like it is now or should the patch be changed like Jeff said? I need a bit more h

GNU Mach 1.x patch

Hi, I just updated my autoconf related patch for GNU Mach 1.x on savannah. Here is the comment I placed on savannah and the patch: I did make the changes Alfred proposed in his mail: http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/